Thursday 21 March 2013

The endangered Asiatic Lion population

Breitenmoser, U., Mallon, D.P., Ahmad Khan, J. and Driscoll, C. 2008 Panthera leo ssp. Persica. IUCN List of Threatened Species, Cambridge, U.K. Available from:
http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/15952/0



Shankaranarayanan, P., Benerjee, M., Kacker, R.K., and Singh, L. 1997. Genetic Variation in Asiatic lions and Indian tigers. Electrophoresis. 18: 1693–1700.
http://www.freewebs.com/hmgrgcb/publication/Elec%20shankar%20et%20al%201997.pdf

WCT. 2013. Asiatic Lion: history, population, human animal conflict, breeding program. Wildlife Conservation Trust. Available from:
http://www.asiaticlion.org/asiatic-lion-history.htm

WWF. 2007. Critically endangered lion now found only in India. World Wildlife Fund. Available from:
http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/teacher_resources/best_place_species/current_top_10/asiatic_lion_.cfm

 
The population of the Asiatic Lions in Sasan Gir, India is listed as endangered by the IUCN (WWF 2007). The Asiatic Lion used to have a range from the Middle East to India, but now it is strictly found in Sasan Gir, India. The population size of Asiatic Lions found in Sasan Gir, India in 2010 consist of approximately 411 lions (WCT 2013).

Due to over-hunting and an extreme famine between 1901 and 1905 the entire Asiatic Lion population in the late 19th century reached a size of approximately 12 lions (WCT 2013). A breeding center had to be established where these lions were breed in captivity. The biggest issue with the entire Asiatic Lion population reaching 12 lions is inbreeding depression. 

In 1997, Shankaranarayanan et al. conducted a study to examine the population of 38 Asiatic lions in the Gir Forest Sanctuary in India to determine the extent of inbreeding within the population. Previous research done on the Asiatic Lions had showed that they were highly inbred and had very low levels of genetic variation. Blood samples of the 38 Asiatic Lions were taken and they were analysed using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (RAPD is a type of PCR reactions that amplifies random segments of DNA). Shankaranarayanan et al. found that the population of 38 Asiatic lions had an average heterozygosity of 25.82%.  To try and determine the level of heterozygosity found in the subspecies of Asiatic Lions before they had reached an approximate size of 12, the researchers analysed 50 to 125 year old skin samples found in museums. The results showed that these old skin samples had a heterozygosity of 21.01%, which is close to that of the current population. The researchers concluded that Asiatic Lions have always had a low genetic variability, and that it is probably a characteristic of this subspecies. It is interesting that even though the human population almost drove this subspecies to extinction, they somehow managed to bring it back with the same level of genetic variation.


The most crucial error with Shankaranarayanan et al.’s study is: how are they to be sure the old skin samples found in museums were not from the same pride. It seems highly unlikely that they would be able to determine what population these old skins came from.

Thus, even though humans were the cause of the population reaching 12 lions they have also brought the population back to a stable size. In reality we have made progress in conserving the last Asiatic Lion population. Although, I believe more studies need to be done before we can determine if we have actually created a population of highly inbred Asiatic Lions.

It seems like this “revival story” is continuously discussed in conservation: humans destroy an entire population, but then they revive it. It makes me wonder if we will ever learn to try and conserve the population in the first place rather than destroy it and then spend a large sum of money to fix it.
 
Word Count: 494



Tuesday 5 March 2013

It is a rite of passage that has been done for hundreds of years

MacKenzie, D. 2008. Faroe islands told to stop eating 'toxic' whales. NewScientist. Available from:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16159-faroe-islanders-told-to-stop-eating-toxic-whales.html
Maris. Save the long-finned pilot whales. change.org. Available from:
http://www.change.org/petitions/save-the-long-finned-pilot-whales
Whaling in the Faroe Islands. Wikipedia. Available from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling_in_the_Faroe_Islands

In the first few weeks of our conservation biology class we briefly covered the topic of social justice. An example of social justice is allowing local natives to do whale hunts because they have a right to do so. A year or so ago I stumbled upon an article about pilot whales (falsely known as calderon dolphins) in Denmark. As you read below I am sure you will feel just as disturbed as I felt if not more about this "native hunt".

 
Around 950 pilot whales are forced into the bays of the Faroe Islands (change.org).  The animals are hit several times severing their spine in many places with a  thick rope that has a sharp hook on the end (gaff). Below, in Table 1 are some stats showing the amount of whales that are caught annually, there is no source listed for this other than wikipedia, so it may not be accurate. Although, they are said to be from The Faroe Island Statistical Office.
                              Table 1. The amount drives per year, and the amount of whales killed.
                               note: there is usually one main whale hunt
File:Hvalba beach whaling, Faroe Islands.jpg
This brutal slaughter goes on annually. It is a male rite of passage into manhood in Faroese society. A male is not considered to have reach manhood until they have taken part in the ritual. The Faroese people also feel it is a part of their culture and history (MacKenzie 2008).

The whale meat may not actually be consumed after this event. In recent years the chief medical officers of the Faroe Islands stated that the meat has high levels of mercury and contains too many other toxins to consume (MacKenzie 2008).

There has been a lot of controversy over this issue and many people have blown this "native whale hunt" slightly out of proportion. Many of the blog sites and internet newspaper sites have said other objects have been used such as harpoons, rocks, and sharp knives to kill the pilot whales. From the few hours I spent researching the web I believe that this is false. There have also been inaccurate stats released describing 2,500-3000 pilot whales being killed during the annual hunt. I believe the stats are closer to the wikepedia version.


This begs the question, should the Faroese people be allowed to do pilot whale hunts?

Word Count: 359